Infants’ Physical World
نویسنده
چکیده
Investigations of infants’ physical world over the past 20 years have revealed two main findings. First, even very young infants possess expectations about physical events. Second, these expectations undergo significant developments during the first year of life, as infants form event categories, such as occlusion, containment, and covering events, and identify the variables relevant for predicting outcomes in each category. A new account of infants’ physical reasoning integrates these findings. Predictions from the account are examined in changeblindness and teaching experiments. KEYWORDS—infant cognition; physical reasoning; explanationbased learning Over the past 20 years, my collaborators and I have been studying how infants use their developing physical knowledge to predict and interpret the outcomes of events. This article focuses on infants’ knowledge about three event categories: occlusion events, which are events in which an object is placed or moves behind a nearer object, or occluder; containment events, which are events in which an object is placed inside a container; and covering events, which are events in which a rigid cover is lowered over an object (Baillargeon & Wang, 2002). I first summarize two relevant bodies of developmental findings, and then point out discrepancies between these findings. Next, I outline a new account of infants’ physical reasoning that attempts to make sense of these discrepancies. Finally, I describe new lines of research that test predictions from this account. All of the research reviewed here used the violation-of-expectation method. In a typical experiment, infants see an expected event, which is consistent with the expectation examined in the experiment, and an unexpected event, which violates this expectation. With appropriate controls, evidence that infants look reliably longer at the unexpected than at the expected event indicates that they possess the expectation under investigation, detect the violation in the unexpected event, and respond to this violation with increased attention.
منابع مشابه
Supporting of penal rights for infants and observance an medical ethics
Introduction: Infants have a high station in our society and to support an immune life for them in parents, governmental institutions and NGOs. Purpose of this essay is good using of ethic of doctor for getting to mentioned aim. Method: A head text is written with descriptive and analytic method. Results: one of the fundamental missions of penal right is supporting of value as life right that...
متن کاملHow Infants Learn About the Visual World
The visual world of adults consists of objects at various distances, partly occluding one another, substantial and stable across space and time. The visual world of young infants, in contrast, is often fragmented and unstable, consisting not of coherent objects but rather surfaces that move in unpredictable ways. Evidence from computational modeling and from experiments with human infants highl...
متن کاملReaching experience increases face preference in 3-month-old infants.
The developing infant learns about the physical and the social world by engaging with objects and with people. In the study reported here, we investigated the relationship between infants' interactions with the physical and the social world. Three-month-old infants were trained for 2 weeks and experienced either actively manipulating objects themselves or passively having objects touched to the...
متن کاملCURRBNT DIRECTIONS M PSYCHOLOCICAl SCtliMCE How Do Infants Learn About the Physical World?
Until recently, young infants were assumed to lack even the most fundamental of adults' beliefs about objects. This conclusion was based largely on analyses of young infants' performance in object manipulation tasks. For example, young infants were said to be unaware that an object continues to exist when masked by another object because they consistently failed tasks that required them to sear...
متن کاملDo infants reach for perceived objects? A reply to Stiles-Davis.
Stiles-Davis proposes that the infants in our experiments (Hofsten & Spelke, 1985) did not reach for perceived objects in order to manipulate them, but rather touched perceived surfaces in order to explore their boundaries. Her commentary raises questions about infants' perception of the boundaries, the unity, and the manipulability of objects. More deeply, it raises the question of what an obj...
متن کامل